@0x56 at the risk of pissing you off...
is that b/c it's been working fine for 25 years?
@rpardee - that's a partial reason.
The other part of it is because source code was lost and we can't upgrade it.
@0x56 oof. that does sound not-tenable then.
Any chance of decompiling binaries to recover the code?
@0x56 @rpardee I just looked and I didn't know it is supposedly still compatible with Win98 and NT4?!?