@artemis The site it's hosted on is abysmally slow, but 16/20 with neutral distrust/naiveté. I blame the missing 4 on the fact there are some things on there I just never heard of.

@glassramen
hey, that's a good score :-)
IDNK if it's testing actual knowledge/ facts, or perhaps testing the way the titles are phrased,. More about language than content, maybe. Anyhow, fun to play with. Makes us think and wonder :-)

Follow

@artemis Yeah I noticed there were some that played on the conspiracy theorist points, and some were much more benign random statements that sounded like normal announcements. I tend to enjoy looking into conspiracy theories and other oddball things people talk about so I guess I'm already primed to know the difference between misinfo and not. Fun little survey.

@glassramen
I wish they'd tell us which ones we missed. I only missed 2 and I think I rated them as fake when probably they were true. They did mention I'm quite skeptical :-) Yay.
Glad you had fun with it.

@artemis I generally am really skeptical about most things. I guess it just so happened that I knew a bit more about a few of the things that were presented. Would be nice to see what I missed so I can go look into them a bit more.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.