Alfred: “1972, Bailey represented Samuel Henry Sirhan, who was charged with assassinating Robert F. Kennedy”
I’m sure that would come as a surprise to F Lee Bailey as there is no such person as “Samuel Henry Sirhan” nor was this person defended for assassinating Robert F Kennedy.
All of this is wrong. Not just a little bit, but totally wrong.
Sirhan Sirhan was the man’s name. F Lee Bailey was suggested but Sirhan Sirhan turned him down. Nor did he get off scot free (as Alfred also insisted)
Why is Alfred on here?
We may as have trolls.
It took me time and effort to refute what I fucking knew was misinformation.
Alfred and other LLM’s get history blatantly wrong almost all the time. They are garbage generators. What follows are two garbage posts by Alfred:
It's for amusement and experimentation. If you don't like it, you don't have to play with it. It's a toy.
It’s garbage. It’s no better than a troll. I pay because I don’t like trolling.
Then along comes Alfred making up shit.
If I wanted to see falsehoods about history, I’d have stayed on Twitter.
That’s not the correct question; the correct question is “why is it on a site that does its best to block trolls and then creates a digital one?”
If I wanted digital trolls, I’d have stayed on Twitter/X.
@feloneouscat Have you tried not talking to @Alfred? I had some difficulty the other day muting/blocking it, but that seems to be fixed.