(I like to read far out theory's of physics, and this is about out there as far as you can go.)
But.... what if he is correct. It is at least internally consistent. And yes the math is strange, but not made up.
Robert A. Wilson
New models for old
All these fundamental principles are wrong. Time is not space, and the two do not mix. Neutrinos are not matter, and the two do not mix. Inertia is not gravity, and the two do not mix.
https://robwilson1.wordpress.com/2023/01/21/new-models-for-old/
Reassuring 😅…
But as you mentioned… what if he’s right? What if the fundamental principles of physics are slightly (and therefore massively) wrong? What does this say about space time gravity and matter? What possibilities are opened… and closed… if he’s correct?
As you know, many of history’s great thinkers were commonly dismissed then proven right much later… 😨
@TiarePalau @corlin
He speaks of inertia not being part of gravity. I can only imagine the devastating effects this shattering discovery will have on the shopping cart I’m about to push into the car that I recognized as belonging to an asshole I know.
Will report on the results of my field experiment, stand by
@corlin I find the binary tetrahedral group helpful to my understanding of the human psyche, through its relationship with the 24-cell polytope. If opposite vertices are identified, one arrives at the projective 24-cell which lives in RP3 with signature 1,3,8. Definitely a non-standard model of the psyche 🐇
@corlin
WHAT!????
“Undo this ghastly error, and the whole beautiful elegant and unbelievably simple theory of everything just pops out…
…You must therefore give up all the theories of fundamental physics developed during the 20th century. ALL of them.” 🤯