Second:
The Environment is not a System
It’s a good fit with the previous piece, where it spoke of re-using old media and old futures, of finding new ways of talking about new futures; here we see the importance of how we talk about things, and how we measure them.
By Tega Brain
https://researchvalues2018.wordpress.com/2017/12/20/tega-brain-the-environment-is-not-a-system/
And Finely:
Something completely different.
How To Talk About Books You Haven’t Read.
By Maria Popova
Non-reading is not just the absence of reading. It is a genuine activity, one that consists of adopting a stance in relation to the immense tide of books that protects you from drowning. On that basis, it deserves to be defended and even taught.
https://www.brainpickings.org/2012/06/15/how-to-talk-about-books-you-havent-read/
More:
Also... I disagree, but this is an interesting idea:
Why books don’t work.
All this suggests a peculiar conclusion: as a medium, books are surprisingly bad at conveying knowledge, and readers mostly don’t realize it.
By Andy Matuschak
@corlin
This might be me being defensive about books, but I wonder if it has more to do with how people absorb information in the age of the internet.
Anecdotal, but when I first joined Twitter, if I spent too much time there, I would have a harder time reading a chunk of a book like I used to. When I limited my time there, my book reading would improve, with both fiction and non-fiction.
I remembered seeing a study that touched on this, so I looked it up:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/06/190605100345.htm
Third:
In the same general theme.
Stones that calculate.
The idea of the Anthropocene as the new geological era assigns humanity a special role in the Earth’s ecosystem. This insight is undoubtedly important, but humanity is not the measure of all things. On the contrary, a view directed solely at humanity is blinding for larger systemic connections.
https://stones.computer