@Smersh
Not completely farcical, just mostly.
Probably referring to _ecological footprint_, which is to do with affected land. Not comparable to jets really.

Also the idea the dogs are large and eat a meat-based diet _raised for them_. Dog food is...scraps to put it mildly. I'd argue their food production has a nominal impact mostly due to transportation.

Jet manufacture, fuel production, emissions are many orders of magnitude higher. Not sure my calculator display has enough digits.

Follow

@b4cks4w exactly, those scraps cannot really contribute a whole lot of emissions outside of what we already produce for human consumption. I'm not sure about the other plants, but the Purina plant here in Denver still trains in a lot of their ingredients straight from the stockyards and grain sorting facilities. That's got to be towards the lower end of logistics / transport emissions.

Billionaires gonna be billionaires though!

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.