Ran across a proposal to require drivers over the age of 70 to take periodic driving tests. Knowing several adult children who struggled to convince aging parents to stop driving, it seemed reasonable. BUT...
https://aaafoundation.org/rates-motor-vehicle-crashes-injuries-deaths-relation-driver-age-united-states-2014-2015/#:~:text=Crash%20rates%20began%20to%20increase,drivers%20younger%20than%20age%2030.
@S_r_stone Which would make having a driver's license inaccessible for people in poverty or with limited means, so they'll get poorer. If it's people under 30 and over 80, I would think you'd want to address the specific issues with those groups, not require everyone to re-take driver's tests.
That would place a huge burden on the taxpayers, the DMVs, and the drivers.
(con't)
@S_r_stone Last I checked, people under 30 crash more because of drinking, and possibly not having their temporal lobes grown in yet, and people over 70 because their reflexes and senses are fading.
You won't fix those problems with driving tests.
Young people need better teaching about how to drive unimpaired, and older people need a way to get driven places.
I can't even get to the Dr. since I can't drive or take a bus. Tempting to wonder if I could drive just this once for... *crash*!
@AskTheDevil Driving tests would uncover decline in reflexes and senses, if the tests were designed to do so. I have had a front tow seat to a few family members fighting giving up their licenses as everyone seems aware it is time. One had the good fortune to have a non-injury accident where the responding officer confiscated the license until she could pass a test. Failed before getting to a road test.
Perhaps we need LOTS more public transit in addition to raise the driving age to 30?
@AskTheDevil Did you bother to read the linked study?