Ran across a proposal to require drivers over the age of 70 to take periodic driving tests. Knowing several adult children who struggled to convince aging parents to stop driving, it seemed reasonable. BUT...
https://aaafoundation.org/rates-motor-vehicle-crashes-injuries-deaths-relation-driver-age-united-states-2014-2015/#:~:text=Crash%20rates%20began%20to%20increase,drivers%20younger%20than%20age%2030.
@S_r_stone Which would make having a driver's license inaccessible for people in poverty or with limited means, so they'll get poorer. If it's people under 30 and over 80, I would think you'd want to address the specific issues with those groups, not require everyone to re-take driver's tests.
That would place a huge burden on the taxpayers, the DMVs, and the drivers.
(con't)
@AskTheDevil Driving tests would uncover decline in reflexes and senses, if the tests were designed to do so. I have had a front tow seat to a few family members fighting giving up their licenses as everyone seems aware it is time. One had the good fortune to have a non-injury accident where the responding officer confiscated the license until she could pass a test. Failed before getting to a road test.
Perhaps we need LOTS more public transit in addition to raise the driving age to 30?
@AskTheDevil Did you bother to read the linked study?
@S_r_stone I don't see why you'd need to raise the driving age. We've actually had pretty good results reducing the number of accidents in that age category in the last 30 years just through education. And even that has been sparse and poorly-done and it helped.
I am all for more public transport, period, though. That also reduces accidents in general.
Too often we work to restrict and punish rather than fix root problems.