Mr. Tan Man spent two years in a South Carolina “no kill” shelter - most of it living outdoors. Located on a dirt road with farm animals wandering around, it wasn’t like a typical shelter. The folks running it were very passionate about animal rescue and had taken good care of him, but they required vet references and a home visit before we could become his “guardians.” Requirements like this - or that adopters have fenced yards, be home during the day, etc. - are why dogs languish.

Follow

@cassandra17lina I am thoroughly jaded about the moral superiority felt by the "no kill" shelters.

No kill shelters routinely turn away admission of strays. Turning away dogs is no better than euthanizing a few that are not adoptable. Those dogs have to go somewhere, back on the street or to an open-admission shelter. So turning dogs away is not really better; it is just different.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.