I am inclined to believe that less people voted because the way in which the election was framed did not inspire them to vote.

We took it for granted because it's obvious to us that :Asshat: is unfit, but we didn't do much in the way of rationally explaining why that is. Instead, we used divisive rhetoric and distilled the entire thing down to the same partisan fight that it's always been, and that made it very easy for people to disassociate and tune out.

@kel I turned 18 in 1975. I have voted in every election since then, because "civics class" taught me that as a citizen, it was my duty to be involved. The First President I ever voted for, was Jimmy Carter. I wasn't "inspired" to vote for Kerry, but it was my civic duty - so I did. I wasn't inspired to vote for Gore - but the same thing. I was more than inspired this time. A fine woman who was not a felon or rapist was running against one. Inspiration is not DUTY. And I knew the assignment.

@PirateWench You learned this.

Too many did not, and we did little to teach them.

Follow

@kel We should never have stopped teaching civics classes. And now - with no DOeducation, they'll just keep em dumb.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.