“It is not obvious how many would accept a Supreme Court decision that erased Mr. Trump’s name from every ballot in the land,” Moyn writes. “And rejecting Mr. Trump’s candidacy could well invite a repeat of the kind of violence that led to the prohibition on insurrectionists in public life in the first place.”
So. Fucking. What?
Is the argument now that we don’t prosecute because of violence? That the FEAR (not proof) should be the guide? “Could” is not evidence.
Follow
@feloneouscat I seem to remember an oath to enforce the law without fear or favor?
Did that change?