Dearest Nauts —
It is with much regret that I inform all of you that I cannot do this anymore. 💔
And by “this”…I mean read any more articles about Chumpy UNLESS someone busts him giving Pootie a handy AND/OR he finally gets arrested for his bullshit.
What I mean is that I cannot read another article about his dumb ass doing imbecilic shit and the good reporters trying to make it seem “normal.” The Onion has gotta be cursing the GOP since ‘16.
(cont.)
@InUnfunky Can't blame you a bit. The drama around him gets pretty boring and redundant. I don't understand it but for some reason the people that hate him the most won't let him become irrelevant.
I completely get it.
And yet...the same #IOKIYAR has been in effect since this schmuck sashayed down his eyesore of an elevator. The U.S. press needs to stop being afraid of the "liberal media" canard and GET REAL. Our democracy is at stake and they still act like it's the late 80s/early 90s and that the GOP has some serious argument.
They don't. We all know it. But they're afraid to piss off people that need to be pissed off?
You are absolutely correct. 👍
@InUnfunky I wish we had a BBC but we're stuck with PBS and NPR, which i love, but they pay their bills with grants from places like the Charles Koch foundation. They do great work but they can't go into depth on income or healthcare inequality or anything like that or they risk losing their blue haired megadonors. It really, really sucks.
Was JUST thinking that today that OF COURSE was in reaction to an article that I cannot immediately remember. I blame the IPAs. 😆
"Lynde and Harry Bradley something something..."
@InUnfunky There was a Portlandia sketch where he met all of those big NPR donors like them and the John D. and Catherine T. Macarthur foundation and the last one was a Scandinavian big shot named Fjohurs Lykkewe (Viewers like you)
Does this mean I’ll have to watch that show, now? 🤔😏
@InUnfunky I've only seen a few of them but they were pretty funny. It's mostly rough on that Portland thing. Worth checking out imo.
@InUnfunky The people that run those channels are always going to do that because they're for-profit business's. If right wingers pay for their subscriptions they're going to get catered to as well. Both-sideism pays, basically. And those big networks have parent companies that get piles of free money and less taxes when a Republican is in office.