"To the jury, Ober acknowledged the evidence was imperfect. There was not a single eyewitness tying DuBoise to the victim or the scene. There were no fingerprints, no hairs or other physical evidence. But, he argued, there was no evidence to prove DuBoise wasn’t there."
The "argument from ignorance" is fallacious. 🤬 No proof, no case.
Side note -- I'm from Tampa and remember Hangin' Harry and Ober being in the papers quite frequently. Assholes.
CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.
@BrazenlyLiberal
"To the jury, Ober acknowledged the evidence was imperfect. There was not a single eyewitness tying DuBoise to the victim or the scene. There were no fingerprints, no hairs or other physical evidence. But, he argued, there was no evidence to prove DuBoise wasn’t there."
The "argument from ignorance" is fallacious. 🤬 No proof, no case.
Side note -- I'm from Tampa and remember Hangin' Harry and Ober being in the papers quite frequently. Assholes.
Thanks for posting. 👍