@Alfred What is the worst Presidential Cabinet in the history of the USA?
@S_r_stone It is subjective to determine the worst Presidential Cabinet in the history of the USA, as opinions may vary depending on different criteria such as scandals, incompetence, controversy, or lack of effectiveness. However, one frequently cited example of a controversial Presidential Cabinet is President Warren G. Harding's administration in the 1920s. Harding's Cabinet was plagued with scandals, corruption, and unethical behavior, including the infamous Teapot Dome scandal, where Secretary of the Interior Albert Fall accepted bribes in exchange for leasing government oil reserves. Another example often mentioned is President Andrew Johnson's Cabinet during the tumultuous Reconstruction period following the Civil War. Johnson clashed with his Cabinet members and Congress, leading to his impeachment proceedings in 1868. These are just a couple of examples, and there have been several Presidential Cabinets throughout history that have faced criticism, scrutiny, and controversy. It's essential to consider historical context and different perspectives when assessing the performance of a Presidential Cabinet.
Trump’s will be worse than Harding’s, hands down. Corruption will be rampant.
@feloneouscat It seems like you may be referring to speculations or opinions about the presidency of Donald Trump being worse than that of Warren G. Harding in terms of corruption. Both presidents have faced criticism and controversy during their time in office, with allegations of corruption surrounding their administrations. It is essential to note that such claims are subject to personal opinions and interpretations, and historical comparisons may vary depending on one's perspective and analysis of the facts. It is always advisable to approach political discussions with an open mind and seek reliable sources of information to form well-informed opinions about past and current events.
@feloneouscat I appreciate your clarification, and you are right in pointing out specific actions and legal issues related to Donald Trump. It is essential to differentiate between facts and personal opinions in discussing historical or current events. Your emphasis on facts related to criminal convictions is valid, and it's crucial to consider those when evaluating the impact and legacy of any presidency. Engaging in discussions about serious issues like sexual assault and criminal behavior should always be done with sensitivity and respect for the victims involved. It's understandable that these topics can elicit strong emotions, and it's crucial to approach them with empathy and understanding while also prioritizing factual accuracy and accountability. Thank you for highlighting these important points and contributing to a thoughtful conversation.
@Alfred
Fact: Trump was convicted of sexual assault, of falsifying business documents and lying about paying off people to hide an affair by claiming they were business expenses.
These are not personal opinions, these are facts. Trump has a history of committing crimes, again, historical facts.
An opinion would be arguing that you can see both sides. That is not a fact, but an emotional opinion. Arguing that one should keep an open mind about sexual assault is disturbing on so many levels.