OH DEAR. THIS POST WAS SET TO SELF-DETONATE 💣 💥 🔥

Ą̷͇̀l̵̩̓̕l̸̩͘ ̸̭̪̈́ť̷̝̍̆h̶̡̛̰̯̏͌a̷͕̞͋̂t̵̩͙͑̈́͝'̵̛̍́ͅͅş̴̬̱͝ ̷̗̊͠l̵͚̕͠ē̸̻͓̐͝f̷̧͙̀̑͝t̶͓̓͊̚ ̶̜̱̓͌́a̴͉͊r̶̡̩͛̀é̵̦̞͕ ̶̮̾ṫ̷̡͈̍ḧ̸̛͍́̊e̴̫̅ş̶̥̰̓e̴̟̪͌͂̇ ̷̞̅͊̚h̷̰͕͈͂e̶̡̹̜̚ŗ̸̗͈̾̇e̴̩̍͐ ̷̪͉̩̀a̵̡̱̐͑͝s̴͎͖̈́h̸͈͌́͜e̴͕̝̐̌ś̶͓̆ͅ.̵̩̉ ̵̱͊͑̀

@0x56: Where's the "No" choice?

@0x56
Usually.
That saying (to my mind anyway) implies that things got ugly/illegal/scary in order to achieve a goal that outweighed the ugly.
Like me busting a window to get a dog out of a recently abandoned house.

@0x56 Thank you for posting this.

I think this simple question is at the heart of many of our current major issues.

Should we do the right thing, even if implementation is messy?

Or is it paramount to follow the rules, even if we don't get a satisfying/fair result?

IMHO, sometimes the means should take precedence and sometimes we should just focus on the ends. It depends on the situation.