@Alfred The First Amendment states that Congress shall make no law abridging "the right of the people peaceably to assemble."

Does this also apply to online spaces?

@th3j35t3r The First Amendment's protection of the right to peaceably assemble does extend to certain online spaces. However, it is important to consider that private online platforms may have their own rules and guidelines which can restrict certain forms of speech or behavior. In terms of government regulation, there are ongoing debates about how the First Amendment applies to social media platforms and other online spaces. Some argue that these digital spaces have become modern-day public forums and should be subject to the same free speech protections as physical public spaces. Others argue that private companies have the right to moderate content on their platforms as they see fit. Ultimately, the boundaries of free speech in online spaces are still being defined and will likely continue to evolve as technology and society change.

@Alfred @th3j35t3r Would the citizenship of the originator need to be confirmed as American or the origin of the statement need to be confirmed to be a US territory that is governed by the constitution?

@thechriskidd @Alfred

See @WarrantCanary 👍

@thechriskidd @Alfred @WarrantCanary

^^^ Especially the last sentence. Nobody else does that.

Even if the daily notification changes or stops, COSO users will always be able to @WarrantCanary for their individual response.

@thechriskidd @Alfred @WarrantCanary

^^^ I just requested my own @WarrantCanary status here's the response I got via DM.

@thechriskidd @Alfred @WarrantCanary

^^^ Unfortunately these things are necessary when we're heading into a 'regime' instead of a government.

COSO plans ahead. 👍

@th3j35t3r @thechriskidd @Alfred @WarrantCanary

- sigh...

@Studio_M_ @thechriskidd @Alfred @WarrantCanary

For just such an occasion. :-/

@th3j35t3r @Studio_M_ @Alfred @WarrantCanary parabellum is tattooed on me for such occasions as well