Follow

@Render
Prediction: They move some HiMARS to Kupiansk quickly and target the railroad supplying the eastern front.
There is probably a bridge at the Russian boarder that would be within range. I assume that targeting a bridge is wiser because of the extra time it takes to rebuild it.

ยท 2ยท 0ยท 1

@jurban @Render Please correct me if Iโ€™m wrong. Was it a stated goal of the AFU that they would not attack Russian territory, even if it meant disrupting the supply line?

@mikeharmanos @Render
Well, even if so, it's on Ukraine land.
But, I would still be interested in the answer!

@mikeharmanos @jurban To the best of my knowledge the Ukrainians agreed only to not use HIMARS/M270's on Russian territory.

The rail line that jurban is talking about is a single track line and the bridge itself is inside of (currently occupied) Ukrainian territory.

This seems to make it fair game.

@mikeharmanos @jurban It seems that other people are looking at that single track line as well.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.