@MetalRabbit13 Yup.

@Anouk Didn’t see that one. But I was a fan of The Defenders, LA Law, and Law & Order.

It is macho, but the female characters have been well-written and played exceptionally well. Especially Donna, the lead character’s personal secretary.

@Frenchy4064 No, I mean suing for falsely using his name in the case. He never made a request of the designer. And he might have been chosen as the bogus claimant because of his activities for LGBTQ rights and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

I’ve gotten hooked on Suits, a series originally on USA network, now streaming on Netflix. Eight seasons, and I’m only up to Season 3!

#scotus The man who supposedly went to the website designer in Colorado to get a website for his upcoming gay marriage never did that. In fact, he’s not gay and is married to a woman. In fact, he’s a website designer himself! Now, for you lawyers out there - does he have a case for a lawsuit?

@NiveusLepus Could be.

Could be.

Too much coffee today must be responsible. Either that or dementia.

@AskTheDevil Jeez, I did it again! Oops.

I hear you, but I’ve still gotta believe that self-interest to prevent bipartisan blowback would apply to most senators.

@damianreloaded Sorry, my last post was supposed to be a reply to you.

At their confirmations, they would have to sign a pledge to abide by the ethical code of conduct as established by Congress. Surely, that would be a nonpartisan issue. What senator would go on the record opposing ethical behavior in SCOTUS?

@damianreloaded Yeah, well, they’re unwilling to do that, and there’s nobody who can make ‘em.

Remember Gingrich’s Contract with America? One of its provisions was term limits for Congress. Obviously, that went nowhere. But Biden can resurrect that Republican talking point by applying it to the Supreme Court, since he’s unwilling to add justices. Make it, say, 25 years . It would have to apply to all federal judges too. And while he’s at it, he can say that he likes that old Republican idea about applying term limits to Congress as well. Ecumenical Joe!

@GreenCheese 👍

@GreenCheese Do the Holy Liquids include adult beverages?

@JV3MJD It’s even worse than that. This case should never have gone to the Supreme Court, which is not supposed to take hypothetical cases. And that’s what this case was. The woman “complainant” never sued; there was no gay couple asking her to design a wedding website for them .A right-wing group brought the case - without having standing, essentially asking, What if the woman was forced against her religious principles to design that website for a gay couple?

If you’re an evangelical Christian with a grievance, now’s your time at SCOTUS. Get ‘em while they’re hot!