Medieval Christian women had more access to contraceptives and abortion methods than often assumed. While official religious texts condemned the practices, medical treatises show that wealthy women used pharmaceuticals and surgeries to protect their health, with some procedures resembling modern techniques. The truth is far more nuanced than today’s simplified narrative.

scientificamerican.com/article.

I personally oppose abortion except under specific circumstances, but what I oppose even more is stripping anyone of their bodily autonomy by law.

Protecting that fundamental right is absolutely necessary and non-negotiable.

@Museek I agree Museek. I could never have an abortion unless it was extremely dire circumstances and there was NO other choice. But people have to have that choice.

@homebird

Exactly.

It would be the same regardless of whether it was abortion or not... denying anyone capable of making decisions on their own the right to control what happens to their own body is a deep injustice, no matter the context.

Bodily autonomy isn't just a privilege... it's a human right that must be protected in every situation, without compromise. For the same reasons, I am against circumcison.

Follow

@Museek Yeah it's not like the baby has a choice in the matter, right? I am old enough to remember back-alley abortions. Where girls died because of medical "procedures" done with coat-hangers! Women are dying now, and they will continue to die without proper care.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.