imo anything Steele related is questionable

most off what was in the trump dossier was bullshit

he, Steele, makes these dossiers for profit

they shouldn't be used as FACT

@ecksmc Some aspects of the dossier have been corroborated,[19][20] in particular its main allegations that Putin and Russia actively favored Trump over Clinton[21][14] and that many Trump campaign officials and associates had multiple secret contacts with Russians.[22][23] .[24] The Daily Telegraph has reported that anonymous sources believe Russian intelligence agencies may have sought to create doubt about the veracity of the dossier.[25]

@AlkyHauler i did say most not all 😉

Putin favoured anyone over Clinton though Putin didn't want clinton as president because of the Ukraine thingy that Putin blamed her for

so, who ever ran against her Putin woulda favoured

@ecksmc yep agree totally with that, but you can't cast a shadow of doubt on the entire doc because some of it was in fact verified...

@AlkyHauler lol why not

i mean i can throw certain things around and some will stick and be proven some won't < same thing Steele done right lol

thing with these dossiers loads of people read them and think it's all fact when it isn't so yeah i'll question them always

still to this day folk think the pee-pee tape is real all because of that dossier

and the fact they are being used by our intel services is fucked up imo Steele has an agenda

@ecksmc Some aspects of the dossier have been corroborated,[19][20] in particular its main allegations that Putin and Russia actively favored Trump over Clinton[21][14] and that many Trump campaign officials and associates had multiple secret contacts with Russians.[22]

@ecksmc Again it's not all or nothing

@AlkyHauler it's pushing gov policy so yes it should be all factual

@ecksmc No it's not, How in the hell do you think an intelligence report is pushing policy? The only people pushing policy is Congress...

@ecksmc You don't have the basic understanding of the work product. It was an intelligence report.

@AlkyHauler two days ago a leak from this Hauwei dossier was out

the guardian contacted a fe lords named in it who then denied the claims

UK it's pushing policy on the Huawei thing keep up lol

@ecksmc So now you are just moving goal posts? Citing some other bullshit does nothing for your claim. Please read up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier

@AlkyHauler so now i'm what to dumb to understand

🤣

okay then

@ecksmc Well I mean...

@AlkyHauler you are a dick btw

just because what i said something you don't agree with you now think i don't understand

jog on

@ecksmc That in NO WAY means it was presented as FACT to begin with. It was up to our IC community to verify it. They did. All of that was in the Mueller report. Please read the wiki and see what was verified. It's not a hard concept....

@ecksmc No you said something that was NOT FACTUAL. I'm sorry facts are not up to your opinion. They dont care about your opinion.

@AlkyHauler okay then

only thing i said was it was questionable but hey get yer panties untwisted already

@ecksmc No you said it was presented as "evidence": and dictated policy which couldn't be further from the truth. Sorry man, maybe get out of the FOX news bubble...

@AlkyHauler show me where i said it was presented as evidence

🤣

@AlkyHauler again NOT everything in the trump dossier was proven factual ffs

@ecksmc Ok it's obvious you cannot follow a train of logical thought so have a good one...

@AlkyHauler and there you go again

just because i don't agree i'm dumb

ffs what a knob

@ecksmc I haven't called you anything bruh. Just pointing out all of your logical fallacies.

@AlkyHauler srsly now your being a fucking twat

i can't follow a logical thought

i don't have the basic understanding of work product

insinuating i am dumb and don't understand a thing

so, yeah you did

@ecksmc I made the factual claim that certain parts of this intelligence report were proven true, others proven false. What part of that do you disagree with?

@ecksmc @AlkyHauler Okay, this convo covo is getting off the rails. Rein it back in. I'm not taking a position, just want equanimity.

@Cr15ta83ll stop spoiling my fun 😆

@AlkyHauler

@Cr15ta83ll @ecksmc I''m done if you want to be completely fucking ignorant then that is your choice.

@AlkyHauler @ecksmc All calm down. It was a report, nothing more. This isn't the end all/be all of ANYTHING. It's a report. That's it. What YOU do with it is up to you. Much as I assume the author thought.

@ecksmc Let me make it as simple as possible for you ok, this was an INTELLIGENCE REPORT. That's what the folks in the CIA call it. That means it''s the accumulation of all intelligence gathered.

@AlkyHauler no this was a company hired to gather dirt on someone 🤣

Steele's company isn't part of any intel community

@ecksmc Some things are unverified, some things are most certainly verified. It was an intelligence report which technically means the entire thing was up for debate....

@ecksmc See that's the thing though a lot was verified. You are discounting the entire doc. And it's a little late in this election cycle to be even bringing this up IMO unless you support Trump...

@AlkyHauler where have i said i dismiss all that was in it lol

i said questionable

@AlkyHauler huh ??

because Steele has a dossier about Huawei

lmfao that's the new dossier my 1st toot was on about

pmsl

and i'm the dumb one 🤣

@ecksmc Do you have ANY idea how many intelligence reports exist on them? Do you wonder why? Fuck man...