Not seeing this in the news, I assume for liability reasons. For those same reasons, I'm NOT making a recommendation to you here in this post. However, I will tell you what I'm doing during the eclipse (backed-up by Nasa).
Because I AM in the path of totality (not 99%, not 98%, but 100%), I know that once totality has truly started, I can look DIRECTLY at the eclipse, no glasses, and can continue to do so until the moment that totality ends. I WILL NOT MISS THIS CHANCE.
Yeah, don't do that. 100% totality doesn't mean that 100% of the radiation that will fry your retina is blocked.
@mcfate I appreciate that warning (truly).
For sure, there is a danger that if you continue to view when even a fraction of a percent of the sun becomes visible that you can/will have damage, my comment was about ONLY 100% totality.
Please let me know where to find evidence showing that NASA and the American Academy of Ophthalmology, Cleveland Clinic, American Optometric Association, et al. are incorrect.
============
https://www.aao.org/eye-health/tips-prevention/solar-eclipse-eye-safety
https://health.clevelandclinic.org/how-to-view-solar-eclipse
https://www.aoa.org/healthy-eyes/caring-for-your-eyes/solar-eclipses
UV radiation is only slightly reduced during a solar eclipse. And complete totality lasts a matter of seconds.
If you want to get burnt retinas, go crazy.
@mcfate
Unfortunately that graph was for a partial eclipse. And complete totality for my location today will be just over 3 minutes, not merely seconds.
But again, thankfully I am speaking only for what I intend to do, and not what I am recommending to others. π