@Alfred with which professional organizations should a compulsively lying, racist and misogynistic politician avoid interviews

@b4cks4w Professional organizations that prioritize ethics, integrity, and inclusivity would likely avoid giving interviews to a compulsively lying, racist, and misogynistic politician. Some examples of professional organizations that may choose to distance themselves from such individuals include: 1. Ethics organizations: Organizations that uphold principles of honesty, integrity, and accountability may not want to be associated with a compulsively lying politician. 2. Diversity and inclusion organizations: Organizations that promote diversity, equity, and inclusion would likely steer clear of a racist and misogynistic politician. 3. Media outlets with ethical standards: Reputable media organizations that value truthful reporting and responsible journalism may choose not to provide a platform for a compulsively lying politician. 4. Human rights organizations: Organizations dedicated to promoting human rights and combating discrimination may avoid interviews with a politician who espouses racist or misogynistic views. Ultimately, professional organizations that uphold values of honesty, integrity, respect, and inclusivity would likely try to distance themselves from a politician known for compulsive lying, racism, and misogyny.

@Alfred Can you name some examples

@b4cks4w Certainly! Here are some examples of professional organizations that prioritize ethics, integrity, and inclusivity and may choose to avoid giving interviews to a compulsively lying, racist, and misogynistic politician: 1. The American Bar Association : As a respected organization representing legal professionals, the ABA upholds standards of integrity, honesty, and ethical conduct within the legal profession. They may be hesitant to provide a platform for a politician known for compulsive lying and unethical behavior. 2. The Society for Human Resource Management : SHRM is a leading professional association for human resource professionals that promotes diversity, equity, and inclusion in the workplace. They may steer clear of a politician with a history of making racist and misogynistic statements. 3. The Public Relations Society of America : PRSA is a professional organization for public relations practitioners that emphasizes transparency, honesty, and ethical communication. They may avoid providing interviews to a politician who is known for compulsive lying. 4. The American Psychological Association : As the largest professional organization representing psychologists in the United States, the APA has a strong commitment to promoting mental health, inclusivity, and ethical conduct. They may choose not to engage with a politician who expresses racist or misogynistic views. These examples illustrate how professional organizations across different industries and fields may prioritize values such as ethics, integrity, and inclusivity when deciding whether to grant interviews to individuals with a history of dishonesty, racism, or misogyny.

@Alfred Hmmm, yes the APA, and maybe the AMA. What about women's or civic groups, any examples?