Stephen Smith 🇺🇦  

BREAKING: The immunity decision is out. Reading now ...

supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pd

1
Stephen Smith 🇺🇦  

At a minimum, the President must be immune from prosecution for an official act unless the Government can show that applying a criminal prohibition to that act would pose no “dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch."
Branch.”

1
Stephen Smith 🇺🇦  

As for a President’s unofficial acts, there is no immunity. Alt-
hough Presidential immunity is required for official actions to ensure that the President’s decisionmaking is not distorted by the threat of future litigation stemming from those actions, that concern does not support immunity for unofficial conduct.

1
Stephen Smith 🇺🇦  

In dividing official from unofficial conduct, courts may not inquire into the President’s motives. Such a “highly intrusive” inquiry would
risk exposing even the most obvious instances of official conduct to judicial examination on the mere allegation of improper purpose.

1+
backsaw - я українець
Follow

@WordsmithFL They need to be very clear or this is some BS

· 0· 0· 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.

Resources

Developers

What is CounterSocial?

Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

counter.social

More…