38 years ago this morning, Shuttle mission STS-51L launched Challenger at 11:38 AM EST with its crew of seven. 73 seconds later, its external tank failed, causing a rupture that destroyed Challenger and the crew.

This was the local coverage in Los Angeles that night, the 11 PM PST newscast.

youtube.com/watch?v=QA8m6UCYFe

This is a documentary about Christa McAuliffe, the "Teacher in Space," lost aboard Challenger 38 years ago today.

youtube.com/watch?v=XMxRHX8XUH

Barbara Morgan was the backup to Christa McAuliffe in the Teacher in Space program. Her flight was postponed for years; she finally qualified as a Mission Specialist, but her flight as postponed again by the loss of Columbia in 2003. She finally flew in 2007.

I worked with Barb many times over the years. If you need inspiration, you'll find it in Barb's life story.

youtube.com/watch?v=6mo0LZ0mih

This is live coverage of the STS-51L Challenger launch, January 28, 1986, starting at 11:00 AM EST. If you want to fast-forward to the launch, go to the 11:38 AM mark (0:38 minutes in the video).

youtube.com/watch?v=1rDg7S46ij

This compilation video has coverage of the STS-51L Challenger accident, starting about seven minutes into the video. It begins with NASA and content, then switches to the CBS coverage as soon as Dan Rather came on the air.

youtube.com/watch?v=N9kWG-lAOC

So what caused the Challenger accident?

When I was asked, my response was always, "Bad management."

The technical cause was that the rubbery O-rings connecting the Solid Rocket Booster segments lost their elasticity in cold weather. It was a known phenomeon. was warned, but management ignored the problem. Rather than proving it was safe, they told the contractor to prove it would fail, otherwise certify the launch. (1/x)

One of the O-rings failed at ignition, on the lower right-side SRB. A gap allowed flame to burn against the mount holding the SRB to the orange External Tank.

At about T+73 seconds, the mount failed. The SRB swung into the top of the ET, causing it to rupture. The "explosion" was actually liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen coming together in an instant fireball.

Had management listened to the contractor's engineers, they wouldn't have launched that day. (2/x)

Let's also debunk the urban myth that President Reagan somehow caused this by demanding Challenger launch for his State of the Union address.

There is ZERO evidence of that. No one has produced a piece of paper or a witness with any evidence of that. ALL the evidence points to a telecon Marshall executives had with Thiokol exectuives. The recording proves NASA pressured Thiokol into approving the launch. No NASA executive has ever said the White House pressured them to launch. (3/3)

I dug out of the archives a half-hour documentary video released detailing the findings of the Challenger accident investigation.

Since understanding the causes is a bit technical, this is an excellent way to explain it.

It's now on my Space SPAN YouTube channel.

youtube.com/watch?v=Vh8ag6M044

The morning after ... The front page of local newspapers, 38 years ago this morning, after the Challenger accident.

Follow

@pendrag Thank you. The video I posted last night has pretty much the same angle and many more.

youtu.be/Vh8ag6M0444

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.