Tossing this out as an anecdote ...

Duke v. Smith was a 1992 state court case in which several fringe presidential candidates sued to gain primary ballot access. (I worked for Agran's campaign.)

The judge ruled that a political party is like a private organization, with freedom of association, therefore it can choose whomever it wants on a primary ballot. (1/x)

casemine.com/judgement/us/5914

This was a state court judge ruling. It was never appealed because we ran out of time (and money).

Nonetheless, I can see deciding that Colorado can't exclude Trump from a *primary* ballot due to freedom of association, because the CO GOP has that right.

But for a *general* election ballot, the circumstances might be different.

Just tossing this out as a thought experiment. (2/2)

@WordsmithFL

Agreed, an interesting experiment. The decision in Colorado is Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President. It would be a wrongful act to list Trump on a ballot for an office he cannot hold.

@KGinKS @WordsmithFL

It's also further complicated by the fact that it is semi-closed primary. Unaffiliated voters can cast votes, but Democrats can't. Only a plurality of votes is required.

Follow

@peterquirk Interesting point about semi-closed.

The GOP is already talking about turning it into a caucus if bans from the primary. More sand for the gearbox.

@KGinKS

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.