I see the comments. People want J to do something. What, exactly? Silence dissent? Are you on this site so that you’re never, ever disagreed with? That wasn’t the intent of this site, as far as I know. Otherwise you wouldn’t need all those tools you have like block and mute. If you prefer a echo chamber safe space, use those tools.
@Kronykal Disagreement is one thing. Using block and mute because someone disagrees with you is petty.
People do, however, come to this site for respectful discourse, intelligent well informed debate and meaningful friendship. Not baiting comments, not insults, not derisive remarks.
And J has spoken. There are, as he rightly points out, a range of tools available for use against those with nothing better to do then come in itching for an online fight. People should use them more often.
Other than my first post, which I admit was baiting, I don’t think I was insulting in the least. Anything I said that was perceived as such was said because I absolutely meant it. And I’d say it again.
@Kronykal I'd like it if you didn't bait. I like to view dissenting opinions and learn from other perspectives. Sometimes (even often) you appear to not want the same and that you just want to pick a fight. I love to be a swizzle stick, too. Even knowing that it's difficult to not perceive you as insufferable, which I'm sure you are. I'm also confident that you are probably not bad 😉 There was a reason I asked a clarification and backed out. It was a hint, fyi. @code
@Kronykal I imagine your perspective is yours and if that ruffles your feathers then I can imagine that it is baiting you and makes you feel baited. However, that is not how you baited or what you said. You came in and said that he did nothing wrong and should be put in immediately. As a former 15 year old that was pushed into a car after a football game and attacked and had to fight but didn't report, I needed to know your POV so I could filter. Others might not have. ..... @code
Well, fine. If we are going to have this one out.
As a staunch Republican who steadfastly holds true to the US political system and upholds the Constitution (assumptions, correct me otherwise), you cannot in good faith think that appointment to one of the highest seats in the land can be done because a group of people "believe" an accusation of crime not to be true.
It must be found beyond reasonable doubt not to have occurred.
Otherwise your legal system can be corrupted.