Interesting insight on an experiment using Monopoly by a professor. Totally predictable to me as people tend to internalize success amd externalize failure.
If you aren't on Instagram, the net is certain players were given extra money to start and extra dice rolls. Unsurprisingly, they did better in the game. But they discounted the factor of their advantages in their success, attributing it more to skill and choices made.
"Poor" players universally failed and attributed failure to their starting situation.
Follow
U.C. Berkley professor Paul Pitt ran the experiment.
Poor players understood the game was rigged. Wealthy players attributed the failure of poor players to bad decisions they made.
You see this all the time IRL.