Why hasn’t the media talked about the bullet Trump took yet during the whole debate it looked like a normal ear, never wounded!
@Coctaanatis that’s a really good piece. I can’t wait to read all of it. So what about the investigation, a man was killed? If it’s in the article I will get to it but… this whole thing just disappeared!
@Pippy Trump was lightly grazed in the ear, which bled a lot. No stitches were required.
Frankly, I don't get the social media fixation with how much danage was done to his ear. It was an assassination attempt and at least one of the bullets came extremely close to taking Trump out.
One bystander was killed and two others were hospitalized in critical condition.
@Coctaanatis I get a cat scratch and I still have the scars!
@Pippy Do you think he somehow faked the assassination attempt? Because that's simply not true.
@Coctaanatis I think he’s a fake! So at a point what’s too much, several people have come to harm from his actions.
@Pippy The Secret Service says it happened, and they were there. One person was killed (besides the shooter) and two critically injured. Trump was treated at the hospital for what turned out to be a scratch, but which left streaks of blood on his face. There were people who saw the shooter.
Seriously, the conspiracy theories are social media grifter BS and the news outlets are right to ignore them.
@Coctaanatis my comment wasn’t about conspiracy it’s about what the media deems investigable which when you left out my question about investigation changed the narrative to conspiracy.
@Pippy What's to "investigate?" The facts are well established. We know there was an attempted assassination. We know Trump was lightly grazed in the ear. We know other people were killed and critically injured.
@Pippy Apply Hitchen's Razor, "what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."
There's no evidence of a conspiracy.