Follow

πŸ˜‚ I've said this before, because the trial scene in THE BROTHERS KARAMAZOV is excellent for describing the whims of the crowd, but hot dog: Dostoevsky had social media *down pat* long before our current tech.

I first read NOTES FROM UNDERGROUND as a teen, when the self-loathing protag best sings out to self-loathing youth, but I've always loved this chapter, and its description of how even educated humans will sometimes make a public spectacle of pain just to regain some agency over suffering.

😬 Alternately, though, I'm pretty sure that Dostoevsky would have been even more of a nightmare than the rest of us if he were online today, so I'm glad he had his era, and we have ours!

@MLClark

Yeah, and he would have had a bit of trouble with the character limit. πŸ˜‚ It would have been an endless thread...

@LiseL

I'm also dead certain that many of the great novels would never have been written if those writers had had access to social media instead. πŸ™ƒ

@MLClark

Or perhaps social media would have evolved differently and been more like digital serialized fiction in the beginning. I'm figuring it would take them a good while to lose their attention span if the internet simply appeared out of nowhere and dropped into their laps... πŸ˜‚

@LiseL

Oooo, if we'd frozen internet time on LJ and Blogspot days, we'd definitely have a rich and integrated culture of serialized fiction models today!

Alas, LJ got overrun by Russians, Blogspot stalled in its growth model, and we all fled into the arms of Zuck instead. :(

@MLClark

It could have gone so many ways....I'm just thinking about that 1999 interview with Bowie where he describes the internet as "an alien life form.” Turns out the wrong kind of aliens got hold of it.

@MLClark @LiseL

I bought the top 10 NYT fiction one xmas as a gift and one of the books was written in what amounted to tweets … I think it was Lincoln in the Bardo. I thought that was a dumb move. πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

@LiseL @MLClark

On one of the first iPhones w/autocorrect I kept using "aurocorrect" ironically to describe it, and eventually one day I wrote "autocorrect" and it said "Did you mean 'aurcorrect'? Haven't had it turned on on anything since then. πŸ˜‚

@q00w2 @LiseL

George Saunders' 1st novel! Famed writer of short stories that often have atypical structures. It's 1/3 excerpts from old news reports (some fictionalized, some real), 1/3 stage play, 1/3 prose.

He wasn't part of the "twit-lit" scene, but I can definitely see how his experimental novel wouldn't be everyone's cup of tea.

I'd known nothing of Lincoln's long bereavement for his son, though, so the whole "returning to the tomb to hold his body" bit was an affecting bit of history.

@q00w2 @LiseL

(That, and the idea of a ghost caught with a dingleberry in the afterlife, are what stick with me from that book. So, uh, points for range? πŸ˜‚)

@MLClark @LiseL

It wasn't appreciated, apparently, so it's now in one of the boxes of books in the garage to donate to the library book sale (I've probably bought & donated the same books from there 2 or 3 times already). πŸ˜‚

@q00w2 @LiseL

It's a pretty moving tale, of ghosts trying to help Lincoln's dead son move through the bardo so that his father can turn his attention back to the war - and it was based on how absolutely devastated Lincoln was by the death of his son Willie in 1862 - but I am emphatically NOT the kind of person to tell someone else that they "must" give something a try if it's not to their taste.

TOO MANY GOOD BOOKS.
NOT ENOUGH TIME!

@MLClark @LiseL

Huh. Maybe I'll dig it out and give it a readβ€”when I saw that every page looked like 2 or 3 tweets I scoffed and thought "what a poseur!" πŸ˜‚

@q00w2 @LiseL

πŸ˜‚ Same rules apply! Feel free to hurl virtual objects at me after.

And seriously, I mean it: there are too many good books, movies, and albums in the world as is, for us to waste even a minute on a stinker. If it doesn't work for you, move on! Enjoy something else!

@MLClark @q00w2

I remember it was such an exhilarating moment when I finished university and realized I could finally read what I damn well wanted to read! I still can't get over it sometimes. πŸ˜‚

@MLClark @q00w2

I'm not familiar with it, but (just reading your next post...) it sounds great. I'm open to all the atypical structures you want to throw at me, as long as the thing is readable. The unreadable stuff is for a more patient reader. πŸ˜‚ 🀷

@LiseL @q00w2

Lise! If you read it, let me know!

You can always hurl the book virtually at me if you decide it stinks. :)

@MLClark Ok, it's in the queue...
and I'll keep that in mind. 🀣 @q00w2

@LiseL @q00w2

(You, too, lurking @CanisPundit . You can hurl digital objects at me any time. 😊)

@LiseL @MLClark

I tried reading Filth by, uhm, Scottish dude, name escapes meβ€”the whole e.e. cummings word shaping really pissed me off. πŸ˜‚

@q00w2 @MLClark

Oh yeah. The Trainspotting guy. I know of it, but I've never read it. I'd be curious to take a look.

@q00w2 @MLClark

Irvine Welsh. I had to look it up. My brain hates names.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.