A dinner with a guest list of wealthy conservatives. A private luncheon at a university with an invite extended to those who’d given $1 million or more. An event with a large donor-to-staff ratio.

Key to attendance? U.S. Supreme Court justices.

apnews.com/article/supreme-cou

The Supreme Court’s definition of banned fundraising is so narrow that it does not account for soliciting contributors later while reminding them of the special access they were afforded. apne.ws/J4itJA9

Follow

@WeThePeople WHY would they need to raise money??? They don’t campaign. They have a job, they get paid. Period. This should be completely illegal.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.