@MLClark and I’m guilty in part too, I have been using an AI browser like if it is the law .
Oh, that's only human. When shiny new objects are put in our line of sight, we do love to play with them!
What did you do before the AI browser? How did you corroborate data, when you needed to?
@MLClark I’m a fact checking obsessive person, I usually google stuff two or three times , so google is or was my main source but I found out they miss the goal too .
Google used to be excellent, until it captured market share and started selling top spots in its search results. Enter the whole industry of Search Engine Optimization experts - a must-have on any business team to game the Google rankings!
And now there are inaccurate AI answers popping up first, as tech companies try to prove the value of their investment.
So, your Google instinct was right... years ago! We haven't built a better public commons with this tech, alas, and it shows.
Google is only good for searching for stuff that is not important these days
For important stuff startpage
& lite.duckduckgo is my goto search engines
https://counter.social/@ecksmc/112850017874198369
And using chrome browser its easy to use all 3 search engines by setting up "shortcuts" via search engine settings imputing SP into omnibox(address bar) then enter then input search query will give me a startpage result or ddg for lite duckduckgo results
Bonus with startpage is Anonymous View lets anyone access and explore websites without leaving a trace.
@Jorro @MLClark not a fan of brave because of the crypto thing and their own news feed
There was a scandal with brave a while back - received negative press for diverting ad revenue from websites to itself, collecting unsolicited donations for content creators without their consent, suggesting affiliate links in the address bar and installing a paid VPN service without the user's consent
And privacy issues
https://www.spacebar.news/stop-using-brave-browser/
Cromite is a better chromium browser
@MLClark now the problem is , how to fix it ?
@Jorro
It says something about our state of affairs that, early in internet days, folks were taught to treat Wikipedia with caution because it's curated by a group of everyday editors. But years on, as expert sites & forums have been underfunded or lost amid a deluge of bad info, we now know Wiki is a rare example of fairly reliable intel, & we desperately need more investment in such curation elsewhere, too.
Trouble is, our online "town hall" is mainly a bunch private, for-profit platforms!