Why Post.News over Mastodon and CounterSocial? I'm on all three--for the moment--but one thing that sticks out is the fact that Post has venture capital behind it, while the others don't.
What this means in practice is that Mastodon and CounterSocial will always be what they are now, but Post has a chance to really take off. Will it? That is the big question.
If I were in charge of CounterSocial, I would be looking for funding, BTW. The user-donor/subscription model just doesn't seem a winner to me.
@John_Scotus it's a good thing you're not in charge.
@John_Scotus woah it's almost like you don't understand the product vs the person being the product. People pay for movie night here because THEY AREN'T THE PRODUCT and they don't wish to be. the VC model makes them the product, and it's a shit business move. It goes against everything CoSo was built for.