& I know from having grown up since the 70s that different cameras produced different quality results - & then there's variables like the photographer, & who developed the images - stuff like, did the photographer know about things like shutter speed & exposure? Did the developer over- or underdevelop the original negative?
Speaking of, the negatives are gone, I have no idea where they went.
I've started the immense project of digitizing a literal century's worth of family photos. I'm noticing something interesting: scans of the newer photos, from maybe the 1990s & later, are *awful*: the color is off & the contrast is a nightmare. They all scan dark & garish, requiring some adjustment before saving.
Gotta go for it, life's short.
When my dogs died, I had ink prints made of their paws. For years I've wanted a tattoo of the old girl's paws just above my right knee, where she'd jump up on me. The pup I lost this January, I think I'm going to have his pawprints inked on sort of the outside-ish of my L elbow/forearm, because that's where his paws rested when he snoozed on me.
@Halcyon Totally agree. Some things you really do just have to kill with fire.
Yeah Tree of Heaven is awful. I'm so relieved that the tactic I used is working. I reported the ones in my yard to the state noxious weed board too.
@Chex Ooh that's not a bad idea!
Doom-ridden atheist feminazgul. Social justice assassin. She/her, they/them.