All right, folks. ⚖️

I take a bit longer with the chewier topics, but the result is *never* just a summary of proceedings.

Today's piece on SCOTUS oral arguments in Trump v. Anderson strives to explain the core tensions, propositions, and potential implications of different outcomes.

The short version: Today's oral arguments were weak on textual grounds--but that just means this right-wing SCOTUS has a delicate needle to thread, to achieve its expected ends coherently.

onlysky.media/mclark/scotus-tr

@Graci

Well, I mean, generally, definitely yes... 😅

But no more than usual right now, I hope. I have a galette to make!

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.