@CanisPundit I seem to recall the answer relating to ICBMs (not long, but longer than people think), but other land-based missiles might be different and SLBMs and Cuba are game changers.
@POOetryma @CanisPundit There's a Russian nuclear submarine currently in Cuba, and while allegedly not armed with nuclear weapons there's nothing preventing Putin from staging them there just as he's broken numerous other Soviet-era treaties.
@POOetryma @Coctaanatis shelter or evacuation means very little with radiation sickness in the short term and nuclear winter from all the particulate matter made airborne to block out the Sun. Not the note I’d like to call it a night on, but there it is.
@CanisPundit @POOetryma Here's a good summary of the effects of nuclear weapons and war.
https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/devastating-effects-of-nuclear-weapons-war/
@Coctaanatis @CanisPundit It's theorized that even a limited, regional war - say, between India and Pakistan - would have devastating global consequences, causing global cooling for several years and rendering large areas uninhabitable for decades to centuries.
@Coctaanatis @CanisPundit This is true, but the scenario outlined above specifically mentioned only land based missiles. For this exercise, we're ignoring long range bombers & subs. A typical ICBM launched from the northernmost silo there would take about 20 to 30 minutes to reach the continental U.S., giving the president about 2 minutes to issue shelter & evacuation warnings and maybe 15 minutes to decide whether to launch a counterstrike, though it likely won't take near that long.