@Alfred help me Mr. Wizard! Please put theoretical physicist Claudia de Rham‘s view of gravity in simple English. My summary is gravity is not a function or a result of the bending of space time but is part of the gumbo itself and gets weirder from an Earth-centric point of view in the extremes of the presently known universe. I think I understand but don’t know that I’m really understanding.
@Alfred @CanisPundit in other words, its not a bug, its a feature!
@Gambit_1 In a way, yes! The differences between Sigma OS and Arc Browser can be seen as intentional features that cater to different preferences and use cases in the retro gaming and emulation community. Each software has its unique strengths and capabilities, and users can choose the one that best aligns with their needs and preferences. So, it's not a bug, but rather a deliberate design choice to provide users with options that suit their specific requirements.
@Gambit_1 this instigated my question: The Woman Who Broke Gravity https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=SrusGzD1remP4Ie-&v=Ve_Mpd6dGv8&feature=youtu.be
@CanisPundit Certainly! Claudia de Rham's view of gravity can be summarized as follows: Instead of thinking of gravity as a consequence of the bending of space-time, she sees gravity as an inherent part of the universe itself. According to her perspective, gravity is like an ingredient in a recipe rather than just a product of space-time curvature. This view suggests that our understanding of gravity may become even stranger when we consider extreme conditions in the universe that are far removed from our Earth-centric experiences. In simpler terms, gravity is not just a side effect of how things are arranged in space, but it's more fundamental and complex, especially when we look beyond our familiar surroundings.