@Sr0bi @Bix And that may well be the central reason for the SCOTUS immunity decision. That one is "official duties" all the way down.

@Boyceaz @Bix

No. No no. There's no official duty that can justify that crime anywhere ever.

@Sr0bi @Bix Pfft. I did NOT say it justified it. But it absolutely covers for it.

@Boyceaz @Bix

If "cover" means he's protected it means it's excused. Nope. But because people are not questioning SCOTUS, I guess it will be up to countries outside the US to find him guilty.

@Sr0bi @Bix Dude, I'm pretty sure we completely agree. Not sure why you want to argue semantics with me. #AreYouHavingFun?

@Boyceaz @Bix

No we don't agree. Sorry.

@Sr0bi @Bix I think the border separation policy and resultant lost children is irredeemable, unconscionable evil. What part of that don't you agree with?

@Boyceaz @Bix

It's not "the" border separation policy. It's the Trump/GOP border separation policy. Or are you telling me that particular practice has not since been terminated or prohibited in some fashion?

@Boyceaz @Bix

Anyway, I don't agree that it can be unjustified and yet still be "covered" meaning he can't be charged. If he gets away with the crime because anything he does is now written off as a duty of the office (it's at his discretion), then it's been effectively justified, sanctioned, blessed in the system. Take your pick. You're accepting that it is what it is.