@Bliss Since it is _illegal_ to buy votes or offer prizes for them, it's not a case of they "might" have violated the law, so I hope that's not the language the DOJ is using.
To begin with, they should fucking well know what is and isn't against the law. That's part of the job!
This business where they say someone "might" have broken a law, when they clearly did, or "misspoke" when they lied on purpose is for the birds.
@Bliss
I just hope that the DOJ isn't just giving lip service and does something. I don't trust Garland to do the right thing. Muskrat needs to cease and desist or face the consequences.