When a corrupt sc rules, against the Constitution of the United States, that a person in the office of President has complete immunity for any act they deem official, & the decision of what is official can be remanded all the way back to the corrupt sc, that is textbook constitutional crisis.

I really don't see why ANY of the Supreme Court rulings over the last week, or even since 2017, should be abided by.

By the same token that an illegal order by a president can be refused, an illegal ruling by a corrupt supreme court need not be listened to.

Since this corrupt & criminal Supreme Court has now made unconstitutional rulings, any & all of their rulings should be considered unconstitutional & thereby not needing to be abided by, no matter what any legal scholar or lawyer says.