I know @White_Rabbit and i differed on opinions on this subject. Personally I thought the repudiation was a difficult hurdle, and a potential attachment vector itself, he thought that it was rapidly becoming the only deterrent. (He's not wrong there)
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/07/hacking-back-active-defense/533679/
I mean, it's good to keep everything within the boundaries of the law, when it's traceable.
If you're going to do it though, you'd better be good at it. There's a lot that can go wrong.. I like the one dude saying to leave it up to specialized companies.
Moments when the lines between the white and black
..blur
@0x56 @White_Rabbit To be clear, I'd never advocate hacking back. It's too risky.
^^ attack vector, not attachment