@tyghebright On the one hand, I get you and you're right- it is racist. BUT, and it's a BIG BUT, it's racist in the same way that swimming is racist... it's harder for children of color to make the effort to learn, but it is *well worth* them or their parents going out of their way to make sure that they do... because, in the case of swimming, it will literally keep them from drowning. In the case of grammar, it will figuratively keep them from drowning. Language is *it*... it's all we have. ->
@tyghebright It's the water in which we swim-completely. And from the moment these kids open their mouths to speak, or set their pens to paper to write, they're judged on how they express themselves. And *NOT* making sure they have a solid grasp of grammar does them a grave disservice. Yes, it's code-switching. Yes, it would get them fucked up in the hood. But it could also give them tools to get *out* of the hood. It's giving up on them before they've started not to try. And that's more racist.
Oh, to be clear -- I'm talking about my reaction to people, mostly online. I don't hold it against someone or assume they're less educated or intelligent, or have less of a valid point, if they communicate it with imperfect English
But I believe in giving people all the tools they need to excel, whatever those may be. If it takes more for a kid with learning differences, or one in an urban black neighborhood, or the child of immigrants -- society is better when we give it to them
I'd already been fine with most racial differences in English, and traveled enough that someone speaking it as a second language didn't phase me...
But I was definitely prejudiced about people I considered stupid... whether it was a redneck accent, or someone who had limited intelligence. Which was classist and ableist of me.
This friend's facility, once he was given a form to express himself, just exploded that bias.