: The Supremes did what I figured they'd do, and I'm a little surprised there were no dissents. For starters, I'm surprised the hardcore states rights crowd didn't have a dissent or two, and I'm surprised the justices on the left didn't have one or two because of the same reason, though from a different approach.
I knew it'd be a hot-button decision, of course, but I figured it'd go down some easier with at least some kind of dissent.
@thedisasterautist I think the issue that bothers me the most has nothing to do with Trump in CO on the ballot.
My biggest peeve with the Supreme Court is how they have been ruling on what should fall under State Laws and what Should be under Federal laws.
I get that it opens issues if only one or two states have rulings that keep Trump off the ballot and could cause chaos with Elections and the electoral votes to just begin with.
So why did they break up Roe vs. Wade to the States?
@SatuUnelmia: Bingo.
That's the key dissonance for me. They're being really conveniently uneven on what states rights are and are not.