Follow

@Kinnison It would just be terrible if she lost her job and nobody would speak to her or serve her in public businesses.

@Boyceaz @sfleetucker

Remember some Twilight zone type episode where a person got a forehead mark as a punishment for a crime. Everyone in society would treat him as if he didn't exist. He got mugged and a broken arm and couldn't get treatment. and that wasn't even the worst. It was the loneliness

Do not want to live in a society where that is a punishment. Civil fine and community service should be enough.

But put stockade for a few nights would also be okay

@Kinnison @Boyceaz It is a terrible punishment, but it’s also very effective at making sure the behavior stops. Anyone seeing this wretched bigot will be discouraged from spouting racist lies. It’s a much better deterrent than prison, because it’s visible.

@sfleetucker

studies have shown people break laws mainly because they think they can get away with it. The consequences are not the deterrent

@Kinnison hmmm.... Do those studies include "shunning" as a possible consequence, or just the usual carceral tools of imprisonment, parole and fines?

@Kinnison I ask because in religious cults shunning is an extremely effective tool for controlling behavior. (See Amish, Christian Scientist, Mormon ...)

@sfleetucker

Yes, Negative enforcement is very effective. But also cruel and leads to abuse. There are better ways

I think it is better to improve society so much that people do not need to commit crimes to survive. And Not to use the fear of punishment to change behavior.

@Kinnison But this crime wasn't even close to being a necessity. She wasn't stealing bread for food (or to pay for drug even), she literally made up a lie for "clout" on social media, and then let that lie blossom into a massive assault on innocent immigrants.

@sfleetucker

I am sorry, I should have asked you to be specific

show me the law that was broken. Stochastic Terrorism isn't technically a crime. That is a term used to describe behavior

@Kinnison And this isn't a punishment instituted by a court, they hypothetical action was a response from the community to her lying about a minority.

@sfleetucker

look. I dont think this discussion is going anywhere. Neither of us is going to change our mind and it is getting very muddled in details.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.