#football It might be impractical to do, but why can’t a QB’s passing-yard stats reflect only the yards thrown for completions, instead of the total yards gained? I mean, the QB throws a ten-yard pass to a back who then runs for sixty yards before being tackled. In my view, the QB should be credited with ten yards only, since it was the running back who got the extra sixty yards.
What say you?
@Beardalope Since the yards-after-catch is a stat, the receiver would be able to get credit for the yards passed that he caught. And the QB could then get credit for that stat, since he threw the pass. But now both the receiver and the QB get credit for the total. So the receiver actually gets two stats from that one pass play. The QB has little to do with that second stat in most cases, yet he gets credit for it in the total.
@Beardalope Yes, they measure field goal distance from where it’s kicked, so punters should be treated the same. And when a QB scrambles in the backfield and finally hurls a caught pass, the distance is measured from the line of scrimmage, even though he might be twenty yards back at the time.
@johnldeboer Exactly. We have the technology to accurately measure each play and the true yardage. We should have updated statistical categories that show as such.
@Beardalope And while I’m on my soap box, what’s with the two-minute warning other than another excuse to have a commercial - and a long one at that. The coaches and players don’t know how much time is left and have to be reminded so they can plan closing minutes strategy? Are college football teams more alert? Give me a break.
@johnldeboer You do see some statisticians accounting for yards after catch as a sub-stat, and it does give a better overall picture of the receiver's playmaking ability. Similar to yards after contact for a running back. It's an interesting discussion.
In the same vein, punt distance should be measured from the spot of the kick the same as field goals. Not from the line of scrimmage as is currently done.