60%? You know who said this? A company called The Lending Club. Where did they get their numbers? No fucking clue. They point to CNBC’s study which says 70%. However, it may come down to Survey Monkeys, an online survey company.

Sanders: "We are living in an economy today where people on top are doing phenomenally well while 60 percent of our people are living paycheck to paycheck."

That didn’t make Trump a better candidate or Harris a worse one.

Try again.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/bernie-sanders-working-class-angry-144221501.html

The problem is that Sanders has a lot of anger towards the rich. I get that.

What I don’t get is him thinking he is one of us. He hasn’t been one of us for a VERY LONG time.

Raise your hand if you make $174,000. Hell, our combined salaries never came close to that and I’m a software engineer.

I’m really really tired if the rich pretending they know what the rest of us think.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/bernie-sanders-working-class-angry-144221501.html

@feloneouscat

Respectfully, does someone needs to be poor or making working class wages to advocate for the poor or working class?

I don't begrudge him his salary for a second. His working class BG and bona fides are solid.

There's few who understand or can speak to that audience as well as him and do it in a way that's genuine.

I think his instincts are very good and his voice is necessary for the Dems now...

@TheAbbotTrithemius

Biden walked a picket line and helped teamsters keep their pensions. The argument is one he trotted out eight years ago and is still thin as gruel.

He’s also the one who said he didn’t know about his own campaign treating women badly (which is WHY his second campaign was run by a union).

But, yeah, bonifides.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/10/bernie-sanders-apologizes-for-sexual-harassment-in-2016-campaign.html

@TheAbbotTrithemius

Sanders also was on the gang that wanted to plant a “low-level” nuclear waste dump in a poor Hispanic community.

From nrc.gov:

“The radioactivity can range from just above background levels found in nature to very highly radioactive in certain cases such as parts from inside the reactor vessel in a nuclear power plant.“

🤔😳😳😳😱😱😱

And Sanders was FOR this.

Either he didn’t understand the issue or didn’t care.

I’m sorry it bothers me.

https://www.texastribune.org/2016/02/28/Sanders-Nuclear-Waste-Votes-Divide-Texas-Activists/

@feloneouscat @TheAbbotTrithemius
And people wonder why I'm against nuclear power. This is why. It always comes down to where the nuclear waste is stored.

@jjGravitas @TheAbbotTrithemius

I hear you.

And it gets worse if you know how dirty mining is (and how dangerous).

TODAY, we really don’t need nuclear power. It is and expensive way to generate power. No generator has ever lived up to “cheap energy” — there is an economic cost that everyone pretends doesn’t exist.

Even the touted “small nuclear reactors” are expensive ways to generate power. But we have to pretend they are competitive or no one will buy them.

@feloneouscat @TheAbbotTrithemius
Imagine the cost of maintaining, forever, storage facilities to house nuclear waste to protect the population from it. Then add that cost to the cost of generating & distributing nuclear power. The cost keeps rising & continues long after you stop generating nuclear power.
Because nuclear waste stays deadly for decades, even centuries.
See how that works?

@jjGravitas

Who needs to be condescendingly told “see how that works”?

Of course that’s how it works.

We have a convicted felon and known criminal with a boggling list of incompetent, malicious horrors under his belt and a single poorly considered vote from 27 years ago that never even ended up going anywhere is something that’s disqualifying to one of the most perceptive, dedicated anti-corporatist champions of the working class?

Nooo..

We need to hear him and others out.

@feloneouscat

@jjGravitas @feloneouscat

We don’t have the luxury not to. If the working class is voting en masse across racial, ethnic, ideological boundaries as a political force to reckon with, then this is a golden opportunity to get them back into the Dem column where they belong if they want real leaders who will actually make their lives better, and not just lie to and manipulate them.

We need vigorous info networks and communicators to reach them. Sanders is real and one of the best.

@TheAbbotTrithemius @jjGravitas

He literally just said Democrats were on the side of corporations. He was on the side of corporations with the nuke waste dump. He voted for a bill to protect gun companies. When he was running for Prez in 2016, his campaign office was sexually abusing women.

He is real, but not what we need.

He is also older than Biden. If Biden is too old, Sanders is also.

@feloneouscat

I don’t think he has any plans to run for POTUS again.

“There was essentially a cover-up" when issues were raised, she told NPR.”

“Flores added sexism isn't an issue isolated to the Sanders campaign, saying it commonly occurs in campaigns.

"Frankly, I do think it's a little unfair ... that the attention and all of the conversation is including Bernie's name, because this isn't just something that's limited to Bernie's campaign,"

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/03/681815362/bernie-sanders-responds-to-allegations-of-sexism-and-harassment-on-2016-campaign

@jjGravitas

@feloneouscat

It seems systemic and comes down to
complaints that women didn’t get certain assignments, he addressed it and apologized for it. His campaign office dealt with it and people moved on.

What else is necessary?

“Sexual abuse” is a misleading allegation here as it suggests sexual assault and that Sander’s himself had done it.

Really not fair.

Enough said.

I’ll say it again: Dems need to show the working class who really cares about them. Sanders is vital to that.

@jjGravitas