Phil hasn't responded yet (it's SuperBowl Sunday, after all; he likely is distracted) but one of his friends did, saying, "is this nazi germany?" and claiming, "Your statement is a violation of the first Amendment. Journalistic protection is a constitutional right." (Dude, you want to get in a 1A discussion with a professional journalist?!)
2/n
@estherschindler my finding: people choose to be ignorant of facts with which they disagree (some of certain political persuasions more than others). In their eyes even listening to a different point of view is harmful. Had similar experience on FB and haven’t been on for over a year now.
@ACG2
My view is that if I don't listen to others, I can't understand them. If I can't understand them, I can't change their minds. And I must leave my mind open to change, too.
...but sometimes it's impossible.
@estherschindler @ACG2
I have a brother who thinks everything is a conspiracy. He is so wrapped up in it that even my conspiracy loving sister thinks he's over the edge. I love the guy but sometimes have to walk away before I slap him. He does not listen to anything that goes against his "Beliefs"
The main point in my lengthly reply was the importance of whistleblowers in any field (just imagine if someone with knowledge of the Boeing vulnerability had reported it) and why they are protected by law. (I'm loquacious, I know.)
Dude's response: "Liberals really are psychotic... Im not even going to read this rambling ass shit. My point stands"
3/n