@Meekspees *SAYING* "I can make my nose grow on command" is not itself the command. I would argue that the statement itself is true, and it should not make his nose grow.

His "command" to make his nose grow is simply to tell a lie.

Now, if there was some mechanism that prevents him from telling a lie *SOLELY* to cause his nose to grow, the statement would be false, and therefore make his nose grow.

But he couldn't say it JUST to cause it to grow.

Follow

@Meekspees It would take an "Asimov law" type restriction that physically prevents him from telling a lie when the purpose of the lie is solely to grow his nose.

But he could justify it that way after-the fact.

"Hey, can you make your nose grow on command?"

(Intending to actually lie) "Of course I can!"

<nose grows, Pinocchio gets a little worried> "Uh…. See!"

But he'd only be able to do it once. Because future attempts would be "purposeful" and he couldn't say it.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

CounterSocial is the first Social Network Platform to take a zero-tolerance stance to hostile nations, bot accounts and trolls who are weaponizing OUR social media platforms and freedoms to engage in influence operations against us. And we're here to counter it.