According to one article
https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/8vp1kxh5f
Chinese and Russian input influenced the inclusion of broad language, which makes sense given both governments’ consistent position that cybercrime extends beyond just conventional hacking, malware distribution, or theft of money or data, and includes the potential harms that information could cause.
The push for this treaty began in October 2017 when Russia drafted and submitted a proposal for international cooperation in combating cybercrime
¯\(°_o)/¯
I mean, talk about ironic
From the outset, the committee faced widespread disagreement over the treaty's wording, with countries like China pushing to include provisions against "spreading false information" as a cybercrime - ongoing disagreements led to compromises in the treaty's language, resulting in vague and broad descriptions
crux of their argument is clear: the current language is insufficient and does not successfully balance the need for increased security with individual data privacy.
More here: #Cybercrime
https://www.oodaloop.com/archive/2024/08/11/the-un-cybercrime-is-treaty-getting-ready-for-prime-time/