I missed the airing of grievances this year, so here goes.
While I find myself internally nodding in agreement with most of the epithets and hemi-demi-semi-portmanteaus I see describing GOP extremists and Trump-loyalists (e.g. MAGAts, redumblicans, repugnicans, etc.) I can't help but feel that their use by people who disagree with them is stooping.
Degrading the discourse.
It's fun. It 'feels' good, but we promote the idiocracy by joining in.
Is it only me? Feel free to discuss/disagree.
@justsaywhy
No. If someone is a nazi or a fascist (or a conservative or a liberal), I 100% think those are valid labels.
But I can't agree that ALL republicans are nazi's, or that ALL republicans are repugnant. Nor should we believe that all people who support DT are maggots.
Similarly, not all democrats are demons. Or cucks. Or libtards. Or snowflakes.
And I'm SURE I've done it myself. Because it feels good. I just wish to stop. To upgrade the discourse, and leave the playground behind.