Perplexity AI CEO Sputters When Asked to Define "Plagiarism" Onstage.
As TechCrunch reports, Perplexity chief executive Arvind Srinivas seemed speechless when asked to define plagiarism — which is telling, considering that Perplexity has repeatedly been accused of it in recent months.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/perplexity-ai-ceo-sputters-when-asked-to-define-plagiarism-onstage/ar-AA1tkUhY?cvid=6ad4c3f94526435cb82a38a5b245de9d&ei=167
/nosanitize
#AI
It sounds like he froze for a moment, but then got around to the right answer. Perplexity does not present the information as its own, and it is the only A.I. I know of that actually cites its sources.
@ceorl I haven't been following the story, but this looks as if the claims have merit.
https://www.wired.com/story/perplexity-plagiarized-our-story-about-how-perplexity-is-a-bullshit-machine/
@peterquirk @ceorl lol Perplexity crawled Condé Nast property? CN signed a contract with OpenAI. Lawyers at dawn, pistols drawn.
Condé Nast joins other publishers in allowing OpenAI to access its content.
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/08/openai-signs-ai-deal-with-conde-nast/